I'm not a lawyer, but you are. My understanding of the reasons for judgment is that the case went the way that it did because the plaintiffs framed the issue as one of freedom of expression--and that, if it had been framed in terms of the "no-establishment" clause, the outcome might have been be different.
That is messed up.
ReplyDeleteIrritating, yes. Surprising, no.
ReplyDelete.
ReplyDeleteWhat's the prob? Alito quoted John Lennon. SCOTUS must be kewl now!
Anyways, you shouldn't use alcohol to cope with life's disappointments.
I'm kidding. Bottoms up!
.
I'm not a lawyer, but you are. My understanding of the reasons for judgment is that the case went the way that it did because the plaintiffs framed the issue as one of freedom of expression--and that, if it had been framed in terms of the "no-establishment" clause, the outcome might have been be different.
ReplyDelete